Michael...I do like this approach but what about the champion stud who does not produce well and the bitch that does her winning in the whelping box? Not all champion studs and btiches are good producers. This might encourage breeding to the "favor of the week" instead of in depth pedigree study and evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of each pair. We already have an issue with people putting CKCS in the ring to finish that are not true outstanding examples of the breed. I have seen CKCSs that I would not consider a show prospect but are shown enough until finished or shown in areas of the USA that it is easier to obtain majors and related champioships. So I do agree with creating a "Gold Standard in the Breed", but we have to careful on its criteria. I do think the idea of connecting passing health tests to the level of excellence of the dog is a wonderful idea!!! Thank you Michael for some excellent food for thought!!!
Take care, Kathy Yonkers Stuarthome CKCS ========================================================= "Magic Commands": to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL to start it up gain click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 2002 by its original author.
