I really wish the Code of Ethics could be revised to not penalize people in this manner......I like having two venues to show in.....I have no problem paying for seperate registrations on two different dogs if that's necessary......but to prevent people from having the best of both worlds is archaeic!! This rule will not prevent unethical breeding and cut down puppy mill puppies. I can only imagine who the stoic, stubborn holdouts are that prevent the CKCSC to go forward. Really sad.....No wonder this situation is laughable to those overseas! LOL It's a hysterically sick situation!!!! pam
----- Original Message ----- From: Gerri Dueringer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 8:05 PM Subject: Re: [CKCS-L] foot in both venues > In a message dated 4/19/2002 5:44:33 PM Eastern Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > There is a rule that says I can't have an AKC only dog and a CKCSC/AKC dog > > under the same roof? They are two seperate dogs! > > pam > > > > Pam, > Actually I don't think there is a problem if you own AKC only dogs. You just > couldn't breed them (even to other AKC only dogs) without being in violation > of the COE. Section II. Breeding #3 says, and I'm quoting here..."If I > decide to breed a litter I will breed only Cavaliers registered with or > eligible of registration with the CKCSC." Also, please note that that line > was in the COE BEFORE AKC recognition. > > Gerri Dueringer ========================================================= "Magic Commands": to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL to start it up gain click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 2002 by its original author.
