Perhaps I should have said "love" instead of "loyalty" but it is the virtue I was extolling that also, as you point out, is not the avenue of change.
And, I would not have it any other way. I just would like to FIND another way. Suze Lynn Beman wrote: > So, it wasn't pet owner loyalty...it was love for the puppy that kept > this dog from being returned. I don't think there's a single pet owner that > would not have done the same thing. And, in my opinion, if they did > surrender the puppy they don't deserve to own a dog at all. I guess it just > goes to prove that we're not going to be the avenue to getting rid of > unscrupulous breeders because we won't sacrifice the little dogs that have > stolen our hearts. > > Lynn Beman > Amherst NY > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Suze at Llawen Cavaliers "...I have seen that in any great undertaking it is not enough for a man to depend simply upon himself." -Isna Ia-wica "Thought comes before speech" Luther Standing Bear ========================================================= "Magic Commands": to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL to start it up gain click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 2002 by its original author.
