Yes, Alida,
You are on the money about how I feel. It is a nasty juxtaposition
which puts the same loyalty to our canine companians in the way of
enforcing better standards for them. For me? I wouldn't choose to have
less loyal pet owners.........just spending my nights wandering around
the dilemma of how to pursue unethical people who hurt those with such
loyalty.
Suze
Alida Margolin wrote:
> I trust, Suze, that your
> "SIGH" is not a rueful comment about "pet owner loyalty" itself, but refers
> to the fact that unethical breeders prey upon that quality, yes?
> Suze, if your question was rhetorical, sorry about sounding off! -- it's
> been a long day ... :)
> Alida (and Remy!)
>
Suze said:
> I see this as the crux of the problem. Pet owner loyalty.....that same
> value that inspires some of us to breed better dogs.....is the same
> quality on which the disreputable breeders are literally banking.
>
> SIGH
>
> Suze >>>
>
>
--
Suze at Llawen Cavaliers
"...I have seen that in any great undertaking it is not enough for a man
to depend simply upon himself." -Isna Ia-wica
"Thought comes before speech" Luther Standing Bear
=========================================================
"Magic Commands":
to stop receiving mail for awhile, click here and send the email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20NOMAIL
to start it up gain click here:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=SET%20CKCS-L%20MAIL
E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.
Search the Archives... http://apple.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ckcs-l.html
All e-mail sent through CKCS-L is Copyright 2002 by its original author.
