Hi MAEDA,
Cool... thanks, i 'll have a look and try it out.
One generic comment, it will be better if you could separate the CKRM
functionality (most of your patch) to a separate file and place it in
the ckrm directory rather than adding to the cpr_rc.c file in the kernel
directory.
chandra
On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 17:37 +0900, MAEDA Naoaki wrote:
> Hello Kurosawa-san and Chandra,
>
> I finished to connect kurosawa-san's cpu resource controller
> with f0.2 ckrm. This patch is against 2.6.13+ckrm-f0.2 with the
> CPU resource controller patch has been posted to LKML by Kurosawa-san.
>
> I attached the CPU resource controller patch for convenience, and
> I also attached a temporary ckrm bug fix patch to correct some problems
> I've reported to the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Notice that removing class is not tested yet, because the res_free
> callback is not called even if a class is removed. I doubt it is
> another bug of f series ckrm core.
The patch I posted on Sep 30th with the subject
"[PATCH]: f0.2 do not kref_get in
ckrm_alloc_class"
should take care of this problem
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chandra Seetharaman | Be careful what you choose....
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | .......you may get it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
ckrm-tech mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
