Self-response.. On Thu, 21 Sep 2006 09:51:00 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:31:22 -0700 (PDT) > Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Rohit Seth wrote: > > > > > Absolutely. Since these containers are not (hard) partitioning the > > > memory in any way so it is easy to change the limits (effectively > > > reducing and increasing the memory limits for tasks belonging to > > > containers). As you said, memory hot-un-plug is important and it is > > > non-trivial amount of work. > > > > Maybe the hotplug guys want to contribute to the discussion? > > > Ah, I'm reading threads with interest. I wonder it may not good to use pgdat for resource controlling. For example In following scenario, == (1). add <pid> > /mnt/configfs/containers/my_container/add_task (2). <pid> does some work. (3). echo <pid> > /mnt/configfs/containers/my_container/rm_task (4). echo <pid> > /mnt/configfs/containers/my_container2/add_task == (if fake-pgdat/memory-hotplug is used) The pages used by <pid> in (2) will be accounted in 'my_container' after (3). Is this user's wrong use of system ? -Kame ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech