On 9/20/06, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For example > > In following scenario, > == > (1). add <pid> > /mnt/configfs/containers/my_container/add_task > (2). <pid> does some work. > (3). echo <pid> > /mnt/configfs/containers/my_container/rm_task > (4). echo <pid> > /mnt/configfs/containers/my_container2/add_task > == > (if fake-pgdat/memory-hotplug is used) > The pages used by <pid> in (2) will be accounted in 'my_container' after (3). > Is this user's wrong use of system ?
Yes. You can't use memory node partitioning for file pages in this way unless you have strict controls over who can access the data sets in question, and are careful to prevent people from moving between containers. So it's not suitable for all uses of resource-isolating containers. Who is to say that the pages allocated in (2) *should* be reaccounted to my_container2 after (3)? Some people might want that, other (including me) might not. Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
