Am 21.02.2018 um 15:35 schrieb SCOTT PACKARD:
I found it confusing also; I've only gone through the website's downloads
verbiage.
.fc26 clearly indicates Fedora 26
.el7 would be RHEL7
point was that there are binary packages which working fine all over
distributions and since they simply include patches when appropriate i
don't get the question "should i continue a known vulnerable version or
even start with some beta"
the build-spec below even distincts if the tarball is PHP 7.1 or 7.2 to
apply the correct patches depending on the used tarball
[builduser@testserver:/rpmbuild/SPECS]$ cat php.spec | grep patch
Patch1: php-71-realpath-cache-openbasedir.patch
Patch2: php-71-systzdata.patch
Patch3: php-72-systzdata.patch
%patch1 -p1 -b .realpath-71
%patch3 -p1 -b .systzdata-72
%patch2 -p1 -b .systzdata-71
clamav-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64
clamav-data-empty-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
clamav-filesystem-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
clamav-lib-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64
clamav-milter-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64
clamav-milter-systemd-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
clamav-scanner-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
clamav-scanner-systemd-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
clamav-server-0.99.3-4.fc26.x86_64
clamav-server-systemd-0.99.3-4.fc26.noarch
_______________________________________________
clamav-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
