n 7/26/21 8:39 PM, Micah Snyder (micasnyd) via clamav-users wrote:
Frans,
Can you please create a ticket on https://github.com/Cisco-Talos/clamav/issues
for the clamd test failure? Please attach the verbose output from running:
ctest -V
Regarding make -j [n] vs ninja -- yes it's not a huge difference. It's just a
convenience if you're compiling a lot. We should probably remove the ninja
suggestion from the INSTALL.md file.
I didn't include it in
https://docs.clamav.net/manual/Installing/Installing-from-source-Unix.html
We do mention it here, which is good enough:
https://docs.clamav.net/manual/Development/development-builds.html
-Micah
-----Original Message-----
From: clamav-users <clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net> On Behalf Of
Frans de Boer
Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2021 11:08 AM
To: clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
Subject: Re: [clamav-users] ClamAV® blog: ClamAV 0.104.0 Release Candidate
is here!
I get things compiled etc., but testing clamd keeps on failing. I tried three
different machines/CPU's to no avail.
I use OpenSUSE Tumbleweed with newest cmake etc.
One remark: using 'make -j [n]' instead of ninja only takes less than 2 seconds
longer to build things. So, the 'big speed up' is only a 'very minor speed up'.
Of
course if you compile a very large amount of software every day, multiple times
a day, those less than 2 seconds do add up.
Any suggestion what data I can provide to find the cause of the failure?
Regards, Frans.
G.W. Haywood told me he would make a ticket. He also - just as the whole
list - has the full Testlog.log file since 25/7.
--- Frans.
_______________________________________________
clamav-users mailing list
clamav-users@lists.clamav.net
https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide:
https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq
http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
