> On Jul 28, 2021, at 7:17 AM, Rick Cooper <[email protected]> wrote: > > total disregard for the user base, not so much as a poll or query on the > lists, enjoy your new cutting edge toys > > Corporate BS rears it's ugly head again, First snort, then centos and now > clamav.
I think this is unfair. This is the feedback we’re getting. Sounds like we don’t need a poll or a query. We’re hearing it now. I also think it’s unfair to think “big bad Cisco” had anything to do with this at all. ClamAV is beholden to Cisco in very few ways. In that it’s integrated into a few products, other than that, the ClamAV development team has pretty full autonomy. No one is coming down to Micah and saying "YOU MUST YOU CMAKE YOU PEON DEVELOPER MUHAHAHAHAHA”. If you have feedback, this is the perfect use of this list to do so, but we’re also all adults, with jobs, with passions, and we can be professional. As far as Snort, I think the same logic applies. The rewrite of Snort started long before Cisco even entered the picture, it started when we were still Sourcefire back in 2011-2012. I have the engineering slides!
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ clamav-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.clamav.net/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: https://github.com/vrtadmin/clamav-faq http://www.clamav.net/contact.html#ml
