Re: 1.1 vs. 1.2 revisited

[toshok]

Paul Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "John Keiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I think jpre should be a separate program ... "compiles only under
> > guavac" is not the intent of the project, far as I know.
> 
> guavac is the only free Java compiler out there.  So it's the only
> logical one to use for compiling GNU Classpath.

That doesn't seem right -- I mean, emacs doesn't require that you use
gcc to compile it.

xtoph