Re: 1.1 vs. 1.2 revisited

[Paul Fisher]

"John Keiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> LOW_MEM (optimize code to use as little memory as possible, rather
> than speed, as we currently look at)

I don't like this option.  Do you know of any programs where they
actively maintain a low memory/high memory version, which ships with
the same source tree?

This is just _way_ to complex to realisticly support.

> LESS_NATIVE (try to use absolutely as little native code as possible).
> MORE_NATIVE (move more stuff into native than usual).

I fail to see the purpose of these as well.

> I can bang the thing out over the weekend if everyone likes it.

Would it be better if the preprocessor was part of guavac?

-- 
Paul Fisher * [EMAIL PROTECTED]