Re: 1.1 vs. 1.2 revisited

[Paul Fisher]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> That doesn't seem right -- I mean, emacs doesn't require that you
> use gcc to compile it.

The preprocessor could be shipped as a stand-alone program and as an
integrated extension to guavac.  If it's part of guavac, then it might
get more use by people outside the Classpath project.

I agree that people lacking the ability to run guavac should be able
to compile Classpath.

-- 
Paul Fisher * [EMAIL PROTECTED]