That sounds like the best thing to me.  Java has needed a preprocessor for a
long time.  guavac may become more used because of that ability.  'Long as
we can use it standalone as well, so that javac will work, it's fine.
--John Keiser

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Fisher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Fisher
> Sent: Thursday, August 06, 1998 3:32 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: 1.1 vs. 1.2 revisited
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > That doesn't seem right -- I mean, emacs doesn't require that you
> > use gcc to compile it.
>
> The preprocessor could be shipped as a stand-alone program and as an
> integrated extension to guavac.  If it's part of guavac, then it might
> get more use by people outside the Classpath project.
>
> I agree that people lacking the ability to run guavac should be able
> to compile Classpath.
>
> --
> Paul Fisher * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

Reply via email to