Erik Nordmark wrote: > Cathy Zhou wrote: > >> Yes, that would be a problem. We have to make zoneadm know that this >> is a VLAN ppa hack name so that it knows to create a VLAN 32 over bge0. > > But wouldn't that approach be confusing when using vanity-named vlans? > We have to preserve the backward compatibility, so that VLAN PPA hack logic has to be kept somewhere, it will still be in the dls module. But I agree to not introduce it in the zoneadm code. That's why I said I will keep those two ioctls.
>> I guess I will keep those ioctls as is. > > FWIW it might make sense to remove "VLAN" from the name of the ioctls, > since they are issued for all datalink names. > Okay. - Cathy
