Peter Memishian wrote:
> > The direction we took with IP Instances has less of an impact on the
> > user I think; we just treat the 'physical' property in zonecfg as
> > 'datalink name' and let dladm be the focal point for how to create and
> > manage datalink names.
>
> IMHO, it's also semantically incorrect: the original meaning of "physical"
> referred to the physical IP interface, which is of course quite different
> from a link. Given all the work we've put into trying to untangle
> datalinks and IP interfaces, I'm distressed to see them conflated.
What does "it" refer to above?
IP Instances does not conflate datalinks and IP interfaces.
Erik
