On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 20:38:45 GMT, Jeremy Wood <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Previously ImageTypeSpecifier treated all TYPE_BYTE_INDEXED as if they were >> opaque. >> >> In this ticket's case: an ImageWriter received the wrong ImageTypeSpecifier >> and mistakenly indicated it *could* support a BufferedImage. But when the >> actual BufferedImage arrived (which was translucent), the ImageWriter threw >> an exception. >> >> Instead: >> Now the ImageTypeSpecifier accurately describes the given BufferedImage. > > Jeremy Wood has updated the pull request incrementally with six additional > commits since the last revision: > > - Merge branch 'JDK-8351108' of https://github.com/mickleness/jdk into > JDK-8351108 > - Update > test/jdk/javax/imageio/plugins/jpeg/JpegWriterWriteNonOpaqueIndexColorModelTest.java > > Co-authored-by: Alexey Ivanov <alexey.iva...@oracle.com> > - Update > test/jdk/javax/imageio/plugins/jpeg/JpegWriterWriteNonOpaqueIndexColorModelTest.java > > Co-authored-by: Alexey Ivanov <alexey.iva...@oracle.com> > - 8351108: removing method javadoc > > This is in response to: > https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/23884#discussion_r1987896914 > - Update > test/jdk/javax/imageio/plugins/jpeg/JpegWriterWriteNonOpaqueIndexColorModelTest.java > > Co-authored-by: Alexey Ivanov <alexey.iva...@oracle.com> > - Update > test/jdk/javax/imageio/plugins/jpeg/JpegWriterWriteNonOpaqueIndexColorModelTest.java > > Co-authored-by: Alexey Ivanov <alexey.iva...@oracle.com> Marked as reviewed by aivanov (Reviewer). ------------- PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23884#pullrequestreview-2674604546
