> Previously ImageTypeSpecifier treated all TYPE_BYTE_INDEXED as if they were > opaque. > > In this ticket's case: an ImageWriter received the wrong ImageTypeSpecifier > and mistakenly indicated it *could* support a BufferedImage. But when the > actual BufferedImage arrived (which was translucent), the ImageWriter threw > an exception. > > Instead: > Now the ImageTypeSpecifier accurately describes the given BufferedImage.
Jeremy Wood has updated the pull request incrementally with three additional commits since the last revision: - Update test/jdk/javax/imageio/plugins/jpeg/JpegWriterWriteNonOpaqueIndexColorModelTest.java Co-authored-by: Alexey Ivanov <alexey.iva...@oracle.com> - Update test/jdk/javax/imageio/plugins/jpeg/JpegWriterWriteNonOpaqueIndexColorModelTest.java Co-authored-by: Alexey Ivanov <alexey.iva...@oracle.com> - Update test/jdk/javax/imageio/plugins/jpeg/JpegWriterWriteNonOpaqueIndexColorModelTest.java Co-authored-by: Alexey Ivanov <alexey.iva...@oracle.com> ------------- Changes: - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23884/files - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23884/files/63337c60..9f6b981e Webrevs: - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=23884&range=01 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=23884&range=00-01 Stats: 5 lines in 1 file changed: 2 ins; 0 del; 3 mod Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23884.diff Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23884/head:pull/23884 PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23884
