On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 17:20:36 GMT, Jeremy Wood <d...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Previously ImageTypeSpecifier treated all TYPE_BYTE_INDEXED as if they were >> opaque. >> >> In this ticket's case: an ImageWriter received the wrong ImageTypeSpecifier >> and mistakenly indicated it *could* support a BufferedImage. But when the >> actual BufferedImage arrived (which was translucent), the ImageWriter threw >> an exception. >> >> Instead: >> Now the ImageTypeSpecifier accurately describes the given BufferedImage. > > Jeremy Wood has updated the pull request incrementally with five additional > commits since the last revision: > > - 8351108: adding empty line to bottom of file > > This is in response to: > https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/23884#discussion_r1987278977 > - Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/JDK-8351108' into JDK-8351108 > - 8351108: replacing wildcard import > > This is in response to: > https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/23884#discussion_r1987268179 > - 8351108: updating copyright year > > This is in response to: > https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/23884#discussion_r1987265582 > - 8351108: changing indentation / line wrapping > > This is in response to: > https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/23884#discussion_r1987265134 Marked as reviewed by azvegint (Reviewer). ------------- PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23884#pullrequestreview-2671724242
