Thanks for continuing to maintain this lib, Chas; I'm glad to see this move to make it more accessible to potential contributors.
I believe the original choice of the EPL was made specifically to support this kind of scenario. Personally I see a reboot as being a lot of effort for little gain, but then again it's neither my effort going into it nor my gain coming out of it. Besides, everyone's doing reboots these days. I do suspect that a reboot will lead to a longer transition time in which both org.clojure/tools.nrepl and com.cemerick/nrepl are in active use by greenfield projects, so perhaps if you do a reboot you could cut an 0.2.12 release under the new group-id which has a stable known-good version and then do the reboot under a 1.x series or something. This might help alleviate the concerns raised by Colin more quickly. -Phil -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
