On 20 Dec 2009, at 19:30, Luc Préfontaine wrote: > That's a concise and clear way to summarize the issue. > > If you compare the IDE support required for different languages, the support > required to write syntactically correct Clojure code is pretty small compared > to others.
I like Clojure, I really do. I find it concise, elegant and expressive. My great worry is that a wonderful language stands to be ignored by the assembled masses of Java programmers, simply because it has unwittingly inherited more Lisp baggage than it needs to. (Incidentally, I'd never really grokked how different Clojure is from trad Lisps until I watched Rich's screencasts on Clojure for Lisp programmers...) Martin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
