I find clojure suitable to pretty much every problem I've come across so
far, since it allows me to write concise, low-ceremony code. The bottom-up
approach helps raising the abstraction level, and soon the concepts of your
domain will surface, so that the code starts reflecting the language you use
in your problem domain.
If you care to code that way of course...

Las

2011/7/2 faenvie <faen...@googlemail.com>

> I agree, that clojure will not gain java-like popularity in
> a forseeable future.
>
> IMO clojure is much more a Language for SystemProgrammers
> (high demands, thinking in concurrency) than a Language for
> ApplicationProgrammers (midsize demands, thinking singlethread)
> it does not have to target general purpose use. But Very well could
> clojure become a mainstream-language  for SystemProgrammers.
>
> other promising perspectives for clojure:
>
> - as a base for true innovation (core.logic)
>
> - for programming android (compile to dex)
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en




-- 
László Török

Skype: laczoka2000
Twitter: @laczoka

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to