Tim's the one to thank: I didn't do much :) > I did some rudimentary bench marking for large data sets and found > deep-freeze to be 10 times faster on > average compared to JSON serialization. That is really a huge > performance difference.
Some final comments if performance really is a major factor for you: 1. You should compare deep-freeze with and without compression in your real environment with real data. Compression hits writing speeds more than reading speeds but may or may not still get you a net win depending on your particular environment since compression decreases the amount of data going around- especially for large payloads. 2. In my tests, redis-clojure was significantly slower than clj-redis due to its protocol implementation. Being built on Jedis, I expect clj- redis to maintain better performance characteristics going into the future (particularly if you end up one day wanting bleeding-edge stuff like clustering, etc.). 3. I hadn't heard of Kryo before this thread so I haven't tested it- but I wouldn't be surprised if a library wrapping something like Kryo could still significantly beat deep-freeze performance. If time allows, I'll try look into this in future and see if deep-freeze couldn't itself benefit from using something similar. Cheers, -- Peter -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
