BTW, I have not done an actual release of Carbonite to put it out in the repos but I hope to get around to that soon. I have been a bit busy with Clojure/West. :) I plan to set it up in our Revelytix CI server so it can be regularly tested as well.
On Jan 6, 12:27 pm, Sam Ritchie <sritchi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Peter, > > Check out Carbonite for a great wrapper library around Kryo. Here are the > API tests, with round trip > examples:https://github.com/revelytix/carbonite/blob/master/test/carbonite/tes... > . > > Cheers, > Sam > > On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 1:30 AM, Peter Taoussanis <ptaoussa...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Tim's the one to thank: I didn't do much :) > > > > I did some rudimentary bench marking for large data sets and found > > deep-freeze to be 10 times faster on > > > average compared to JSON serialization. That is really a huge > > > performance difference. > > > Some final comments if performance really is a major factor for you: > > > 1. You should compare deep-freeze with and without compression in your > > real environment with real data. Compression hits writing speeds more > > than reading speeds but may or may not still get you a net win > > depending on your particular environment since compression decreases > > the amount of data going around- especially for large payloads. > > > 2. In my tests, redis-clojure was significantly slower than clj-redis > > due to its protocol implementation. Being built on Jedis, I expect clj- > > redis to maintain better performance characteristics going into the > > future (particularly if you end up one day wanting bleeding-edge stuff > > like clustering, etc.). > > > 3. I hadn't heard of Kryo before this thread so I haven't tested it- > > but I wouldn't be surprised if a library wrapping something like Kryo > > could still significantly beat deep-freeze performance. If time > > allows, I'll try look into this in future and see if deep-freeze > > couldn't itself benefit from using something similar. > > > Cheers, > > > -- > > Peter > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Clojure" group. > > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > > your first post. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > > -- > Sam Ritchie, Twitter Inc > 703.662.1337 > @sritchie09 > > (Too brief? Here's why!http://emailcharter.org) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
