A couple of quick reactions...

The survey itself is too "flat". It's like asking "do you like red or
green?" Well... I like green on my walls, but I like red on my ties.

Scala has macros and a much richer syntax (although doing anything like
core.async with Scala macros might be like putting tabsco on an open cut...
just sayin') so I don't think the syntax and the macro stuff is a
one-to-one mapping.

People learn to work with a variety of syntaxes and are successful with
them. Java and C++ have viscously awful syntax, yet they are very popular
and most users of the languages don't notice. Both C and Lisp model an
abstract computer and have syntax that reflects the computer that they
model and to my mind, that helps the user of each language grok the
abstract computer they are programming.

I'd like a two-way mapping between a Clojure and an Excel-like formula
language. That way people could write one-liner Clojure functions in a
syntax that non-programmers are already comfortable with. I'm noodling with
something like that right now.

I think Jay and Colin are saying something very, very important: Clojure
feels uncomfortable until it feels very comfortable and then there's no
going back. I am not yet comfortable with Clojure's syntax, but I totally
appreciate it. But I'm doing work in Scala, Java, and Clojure all for pay
all in the same week every week... and bouncing among all three makes
getting comfortable with Clojure a little slow. Further, I fear (deeply...
in my bones) that once I am comfortable with Clojure, doing Scala will be
as disgusting as doing Java is after 7 years of Scala. :-(



On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Răzvan Rotaru <razvan.rot...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I'm curious about the general opinion on the Clojure syntax, whether
> people actually like it or just use it because it provides macros. So I
> would like to ask you to participate in a poll. Thank You.
>
> Here's the link:
>
> https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1GSgfkeThpUYlgFVzhhNIgA1JbTilu6S9eudq_Sbxl34/viewform
>
> Răzvan
>
> --
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>



-- 
Telegram, Simply Beautiful CMS https://telegr.am
Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
Blog: http://goodstuff.im

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to