On 22 July 2016 at 16:42, Peter Romfeld <peter.romfeld...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>>
>>> Im frustrated with `empty?` throwing exceptions for Long and Keyword
>>>
>>
>> What should happen? Asking whether an integer or keyword is "empty?"
>> doesn't really make sense IMO, and if it doesn't make sense, it should
>> throw an exception.
>>
>
> well its a fn?... "?" ! i would only expect a boolean out of it, of course
> if you read doc and look implementation it makes sense what it does, i
> still think that a function called "empty?" should not throw up, if its an
> Number or Keyword its in my opinion not an empty value! (i understand that
> a Number or Keyword is not sequential.. but then call it "not-seq?")
>

I think your expectation is perhaps wrong in this case. Predicates should
throw an exception on invalid inputs. If you're passing a number or keyword
to `empty?` then there's an error in your code. Throwing an exception
rather than failing silently is absolutely the right thing to do.

The `empty?` function isn't particularly unusual in throwing exceptions.
`(pos? "foo")` will throw an error, as will `(> "foo" 1)`. If you pass an
input that doesn't make sense, then an exception should be thrown.

security features in most frameworks are just smoke and mirrors, functions
>>> that dont actually do what they should do...
>>>
>>
>> Do you have an example?
>>
>
> I dont want to make negative advertisement,  but its about csrf, and
> giving false sense of being taken care of for people who dont fully
> understand it
>

I maintain Ring-Anti-Forgery, so if it's anything to do with that, feel
free to raise a concern. Maybe the documentation can be improved.

- James

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to