Er, that test would have be `foo.constructor.prototype === Object`. David
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 10:50 AM, David Nolen <[email protected]> wrote: > There is no simple test for plain objects, `typeof x` will return > `"object"` for many things. only `foo.constructor === Object` is going to > work. This is not as fast as it would seem. > > We're not going to add any more cases to `get`. > > I've said all I'm going to say about this matter :) > > David > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Peter Taoussanis <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > Yes performance. We not adding any more cases to `get`. >> >> `get`'s implemented with `cond` - adding an object case after other >> conditions (before `:else nil`) wouldn't affect performance in any real >> way, would it? >> >> Is object property access not a pretty common occurrence? >> >> -- >> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >> your first post. >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "ClojureScript" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. >> > > -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
