> There is no simple test for plain objects, `typeof x` will return `"object"` > for many things. only `foo.constructor === Object` is going to work. This is > not as fast as it would seem.
The test would be slow, but the cost only incurred when `get` is called on something that's: not nil, not an array, not a string, and that doesn't implement ILookup. Is there maybe a use case I'm missing why someone would realistically be calling `get` for something not covered by one of the above? > We're not going to add any more cases to `get`. I've said all I'm going to > say about this matter :) Just trying to understand your rationale David, it's likely you're aware of something that I'm not. -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
