There is no simple test for plain objects, `typeof x` will return `"object"` for many things. only `foo.constructor === Object` is going to work. This is not as fast as it would seem.
We're not going to add any more cases to `get`. I've said all I'm going to say about this matter :) David On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Peter Taoussanis <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes performance. We not adding any more cases to `get`. > > `get`'s implemented with `cond` - adding an object case after other > conditions (before `:else nil`) wouldn't affect performance in any real > way, would it? > > Is object property access not a pretty common occurrence? > > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. > -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
