NAI has a Linux version of McAfee. I use McAfee/Postfix/Amavis/SpamAssassin on my email server to stop both viruses and spam.
Cheers, -- Personal: Trevor Lauder Web: http://www.thelauders.net E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Work: Trevor Lauder Technical Services Specialist Wireless Networks Inc. Web: http://www.wirelessnetworksinc.com E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ian Bruseker said: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Greetings, group. I'm looking for opinions. I'm currently running McAfee > Webshield SMTP on Windows to scan our company's email. I have a feeling > it's > going to reach end of life soon (my version, not the product itself), and > I > want to replace it with something Linux-based. NAI only seems to offer > Linux-based products for S/390s as far as I can find. Oh, if only I had > one > of those. But I digress. NAI doesn't want my money, so I look elsewhere. > After much googling, I've found F-Prot. It's reasonably priced (no > per-mailbox pricing as some other products have), and its Windows version > is > also very attractively priced (Windows desktops here also run McAfee, also > an > old version, so if I'm replacing one, I'll replace the others too). But > further googling for reviews and such say it's not the fastest and it's > not > novice friendly. I'm not worried about the novice thing, but I would hate > to > waste money on a poorly performing product. Has anyone here used it? Or, > does anyone use anything else for scanning SMTP traffick that they think > is > good? > > Thanks in advance for your thoughts. > > Ian > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQE+ZjvNSiY+RXI7JS4RAjR5AJ9BzqhSAw643i8/b8csDXohye3dXwCfVgIl > JzVtjrHe11+X5yrwEW9A4I0=KYQP > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >
