> On March 5, 2003 11:02 am, Ian Bruseker wrote: > > After much googling, I've found F-Prot. It's reasonably priced > > (no per-mailbox pricing as some other products have), and its Windows > > version is also very attractively priced (Windows desktops here also run > > McAfee, also an old version, so if I'm replacing one, I'll replace the > > others too). But further googling for reviews and such say it's not the > > fastest and it's not novice friendly. I'm not worried about the novice > > thing, but I would hate to waste money on a poorly performing product. Has > > anyone here used it?
One thought on this... Personally, I'd advise using different vendors for server and desktop. If the server doesn't catch it, neither will the desktop having identical DAT files on both platforms will just be redundant. By having different vendors, you'll have different DAT files, and you may or may not find it more successful. Just a thought. Kev.
