For most companies, yes, support is an issue. They need someone to fall back on should something go wrong or not work as advertised even though this "support" can be found elsewhere (crux lists/groups, apache lists/groups, proftpd lists/groups, clug, google, etc)

Crux has a active mailing list. . I tried many distros before deciding on this one.

I believe the following from the site says it best.

"CRUX is a lightweight, i686-optimized Linux distribution targeted at experienced Linux users. The primary focus of this distribution is "keep it simple", which is reflected in a simple tar.gz-based package system, BSD-style initscripts, and a relatively small collection of trimmed packages. The secondary focus is utilization of new Linux features and recent tools and libraries. CRUX also has a ports system which makes it easy to install and upgrade applications."

I am a very strong believer of: simple, small, fast. Many of the distros now days don't adhere to this or are not under active development. Crux is the champion of the universe :)



Curtis Sloan wrote:

Sounds sort of Slackware-ish... I found a small distro like that awhile ago
(can't for the life of me remember what it was called) but because there was
little active development around the distro, it died off.  Kind of a good
reason to go with the big/popular distros -- in a word, support.  :-P

Again, with the trying new stuff thing, tho'... can be fun. :-)

Curtis.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sig Magnuson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 10:02
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: (clug-talk) recommendations for a web server


I use Crux as my distro. http://crux.nu



Jarrod Major wrote:



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hey Everyone,

Thanks to those that have responded thus far.

It looks like I will be putting the PII to the task. I was leaning that way





anyhow. I suspected that a 10-BaseT was fine as it is as the Red Interface


on

my IPCop box. Doubtful I will do many heavy uploads to the Server so internally shouldn't need the 10/100, I may throw it in anyhow. We'll see.

Definitely, don't intend to put X on there, just one more thing to slow it down and tie up disk space. No sense in running a GUI on a server anyhow. Most of your comments agreed with this decision anyhow.

I am still left with which Distro to choose. As I said I would like it to


be

easy to update so SuSE would be the way to go from my personal bias.


However,

it may be time to get my hands dirty so Slack has also been suggested to


me.

I would really like to give Gentoo a kick at the cat but so far it appears


to

scare me (that's saying a lot if I am considering Slack over Gentoo as I always thought Slackware was by far the scariest distro one could choose).

En Garde was another suggestion but it seems more geared to corporate stuff





than the average home power user. Which leads me to inquire if anyone is aware of any server-centric distros. Google nets the usual suspects.

I really don't want to go with Red Hat, sorry guys. It's not my cup of tea.


I

have the utmost respect for Red Hat but I've been hearing too much bad


press

about their latest offerings to seriously consider it.

Yup, definitely have a long road ahead...


On Tuesday 03 June 2003 10:05 pm, you wrote:





Bogi said:




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


I just installes a lunar-linux on a pII 350 with 256M ram. it took 48h to
compile the kernel, a bunch of utils and libs, X4, kde311 and fvwm, plus
a couple of x applications for my wife.




Ouch, although the killers are X and KDE, even on my P4 Desktop it took 12
hours or so to compile X, KDE, and Gnome.  KDE for one takes *forever* to
compile, Gnome is faster but that doesn't help me since I prefer KDE :)

My PII-400 only took a few hours to install, although I didn't compile
anything that had to do with X and I had installed Gentoo many times
before so that probably helped.


Cheers,




- -- Jarrod Major
GPG Fingerprint: FA4A 1EA3 A0EE A842 07BB 804C 0090 14F6 BE6E DE3D
Registered Linux User: #224211
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux)


iQCVAwUBPt14EACQFPa+bt49AQJ5jQP/biMGnpWGcOMhTM5LIOTVvZp1Elk1rRg6
T3Ka4ik0op8cqL5gpp9XJy6wcTUiqFGf6IGBY0eHOu2Bp5XOEHhL0bYwE0x9iU0V
RZmBveKT+N93K7GZeXQmf+5czK29S6qGBA9kxeZ04rN0owj2SUfepFBgAUmljCMl
3631Xj0rkfg=
=/4jT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----











Reply via email to