-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 04 June 2003 08:35, Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> On June 3, 2003 11:09 pm, you wrote:
> > Thanks for the information :)  I haven't tried GCC 3.3 yet, still running
> > on GCC 3.2.2
> >
> > I'll give it a try on my next KDE upgrade and see how it does.
>
> Be prepared for extra problems with gcc-3.3 too.

probably not in KDE, though, especially if you are compiling KDE 3.1.2 or CVS 
HEAD. reason being is that many of the developers run gcc-cvs on their 
development machines, and many of us are using gcc 3.3 right now.

and yes, this is largely because of the speed improvements Gerard noted. a few 
nights ago on IRC we benchmarked it to be "only" 137% slower than gcc 2.95.x 
when compiling the same C++ code (various bits of KDE). this is a remarkable 
imporvement over 3.2. =)
 
- -- 
Aaron J. Seigo
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE: The 'K' is for 'kick ass'
http://www.kde.org       http://promo.kde.org/3.1/feature_guide.php
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+3mYA1rcusafx20MRAlsVAJ4oGgK4lKalltbXegfiF9dIejU3igCeN158
iLodpq41kwol1MBFW3l8hG4=
=MjCN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to