The text of the message is contradictory. If they are a M$ employee,
working on their own, why do the then use the royal "we" in the last
paragraph.
Also, why the attempted legal prattle at the end, "you give M$ full
permission...", "We will not provide compensation...". The second
paragraph is too mass produced to be a single, interested person.
This seems (at first blush to be) at best a clumsy attempt by M$ to peer
into the heads of the OSC, and at worst, a bad joke by someone with too
much time on their hands.
------------------------
Jason Hayes - Principal
Hayes Holdings Consulting
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / www.hayz.ws
Blog: www.hayz.ws/weblog/blogger.htm
#1936 - 246 Stewart Green SW
Calgary, AB, Canada T3H 3C8
See the YOPY linux PDA
www.yopy.ca
------------------------
> > | I am a Microsoft employee doing some research on my own, so I can
make
> > | recommendations to our managers about how we can really make
Windows
> much
> > | better for the home. Believe it or not, I think there are a lot of
> great
> > | things about Linux, and would love to learn more so I can make
useful
> > | suggestions on improving my company's products.
> > |
> > | If you could spare a few minutes, I would love to send a few
> questions,
> > | asking some of your opinions.
> > |
> > | By offering suggestions through this survey, you give Microsoft
full
> > | permission to use them freely. We can't guarantee we will use your
> > | suggestions, but we will review them for use in future products.
If
> > | appropriate, we may explore your feedback further. We will not
provide
> > | compensation for your suggestions submitted through this online
> survey,
> > | though we appreciate your feedback and look forward to building
better
> > | products with helpful feedback such as yours.
