> I understand what you're saying and why.  But, a good number of people do
> not use thread capable clients, or do not use this feature.  So, is it
> better to make it easier on those who do, or those who don't?   How do you
> make the judgement call?
>

It is not a case of easier or not.  If you can make a case that replying to a 
message, deleting the body, and deleting the subject, is easier than just 
typing in the mail list address, I'm all ears.

> I agree that it is bad form to hijack a thread (i.e reply to an existing
> message to easily select the TO address, but change the subject and body to
> be unrelated to the original message).  But having been on a number of
> mailing lists, it happens occasionally, and sometimes on purpose, or with
> good reasons.  It is common practice as well to change the subject when a
> thread is being changed to a different subject to something like "Subject:
> New subject (was old subject)".  But this doesn't happen every time.
>

It is also a common practice of public mail lists to state that hijacking 
threads is unacceptable .

> My personal opinion (again) is that if you choose to use the threading
> features of a mail client, then you must accept that thread hijacking will
> and does happen, and deal with it.  Those who do not use threading features
> (or have a mail client capable of it), must accept that messages aren't
> conveniently grouped, and develop some skill and/or patience in following a
> thread.  There's pro's and con's either way, but dictating how someone
> should be using their tools (in this case the mail client, and the mailing
> list) is not the answer.  Open Source is all about choice.

It is not dictating how to use tools.  I would say it is helping others to 
properly use them.

What would you say are pros to hijacking a thread?

What choice are you talking about.  The choice of email clients?  That is not 
the issue.  I would say it is either not knowing general accepted behavior, 
or ignoring it.  



Andy



P.S.

http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

_______________________________________________
clug-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca

Reply via email to