-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This split is overdue. Though it's been discussed and rejected a few times in the past 3 or 4 years. I personally think the tech issues are lost in the non-tech chatter that has become clug-talk (through no fault of anyone though).
As for interoperability. I'm having problems seeing the distinction. Am I hearing that anything to do with Windows should not be on this list? If so what about asking for help with my samba config because a windows box can't connect to it (and presumably other Linux boxes). The samba configs are rather technical, and FOSS specific. Granted, configuring Windows is definitely off topic, but the samba based problem introduces a grey area. Just trying to make sure I'm understanding the distinction. Shawn (ps, this discussion is not technical in nature so should be moved to clug-talk???) Jon wrote: > Hi Dave, > > It makes sense to me and I think it's a good idea. At the onset, though, > I'm finding it tough to deal with because the new tech list is really, > really quiet. So quiet, in fact, that it's almost not worth posting to > because so few people are reading (or at least responding to) it. I feel > like I've lost a great resource for assistance, but I concede that > perhaps that was never the purpose of clug-talk. > > I know that the momentum will pick up as more people subscribe and since > I can see the long term benefit of splitting the two themes I'm onside > with it. I just wish everyone would freakin' subscribe to it already! > > My 0.02 > > J -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFb8tH2B6Swl9qN24RAqwzAKCFIG+nzwpDA0vXNns5NTRpaypsdQCfbeu5 KZTw9cif0L/5eoLda3AegcM= =RsVA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ clug-talk mailing list [email protected] http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php) **Please remove these lines when replying
