-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Shawn wrote: > This split is overdue. Though it's been discussed and rejected a few > times in the past 3 or 4 years. I personally think the tech issues are > lost in the non-tech chatter that has become clug-talk (through no fault > of anyone though).
Clug-tech is a good idea. > > As for interoperability. I'm having problems seeing the distinction. > Am I hearing that anything to do with Windows should not be on this > list? If so what about asking for help with my samba config because a > windows box can't connect to it (and presumably other Linux boxes). The > samba configs are rather technical, and FOSS specific. Granted, > configuring Windows is definitely off topic, but the samba based problem > introduces a grey area. I do not happen to agree with this distinction, but then networking and therefore interoperability between many different OSs (I interact with at least 4 OSs on a near daily basis) is central to my computing paradigm. I will comply with this distinction as best I can, though for the record I think it is a bad idea. > > Just trying to make sure I'm understanding the distinction. This is good time to have this discussion, before a precedent has a chance to be set. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFb85NwRXgH3rKGfMRApArAJ9z2VuT3XrkLjCMgH3m9YQ8opk3AgCdF92h oA3NWwRpnDU2As9TXv/p5ac= =70vK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ clug-talk mailing list [email protected] http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php) **Please remove these lines when replying
