On Thursday 30 November 2006 11:42, Gustin Johnson wrote: > Why is "How do I connect my Windows box to a Samba server" not > considered to be a technical question? To me at least that question > requires a technical-esque answer... > > I am just curious about the guidelines. I am not intentionally trying > to be a PITA. :) >
I just went to sign up for clug-tech and had a thought when I saw this message, and the lack of a closing quote _perhaps_ highlighting the haste with which the note was typed (could have just been a typo, but that was my observation). My thought -- Perhaps we should rename clug-tech to clug-zealotry. Just a little sarcasm to put things in perspective...no offence intended to anyone involved. I know there are those in this group that are able to shield themselves from the Windows world, and those in this situation are perhaps the most experienced and knowledgeable, and assets to clug as a whole. However, I submit they are in the (vast?) minority. Kin Wong nailed it on the head elsewhere in this thread that this group exists as a resource. That resource needs to be available to newbies as much or more than those that can communicate in ASM. A more serious suggestion is the idea of what clug-tech is would be more accurately called clug-strict or clug-linux. Nick _______________________________________________ clug-talk mailing list [email protected] http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php) **Please remove these lines when replying
