On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 11:06 +0000, Matthew Allum wrote: > On Mon, 2007-12-17 at 11:31 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-12-14 at 13:38 +0000, Matthew Allum wrote: > > > Input events are handled initially by the stage the event will enter a > > > capture phase continue down through children to the 'source' actor of > > > the event (for example the actor that was clicked on) before then > > > entering the 'bubble' phase going back up through parents to the > > > stage. > > > > Does this really meant that the stage gets two chances to handle an > > event? > > Yes. It is like the W3 event model. > > > So if I return false from my signal handler for the stage then > > that same handler will be called a second time? > > No - well not unless you've attached the same handler to both signals.
I thought we were talking about one signal, so I don't understand. What two signals might you mean here, for example? > > > The event can be stopped at any stage by an actor in the event > > > pipeline. > > > > By the way, this "return true to stop further signal handling" really > > should be in the API reference for each signal. > > > > Agreed - Ebassi ? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com -- To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
