On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 17:43 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > Yeah, I would normally avoid any boring legal discussion, but I do think > it's a fundamental part of copyright law that you can't go to court and > defend a copyright if you are not the copyright holder. That concept has > some fancy latin name and it's lawyer 101. And a license is meaningless > without copyright.
I haven't seen anything that changes my mind about this. I want my code to be under my chosen open source license, not under public domain. Therefore, I'll move the clutter-tutorial to GNOME's git repository and use GNOME's bugzilla, instead of bugzilla.openedhand.com which now asks patch submitters to approve that copyright waiver. The openedhand developers have not made any real effort to review the clutter tutorial anyway, despite my efforts to make it an official part of clutter rather than something outside of clutter/openedhand. -- Murray Cumming murr...@murrayc.com www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com -- To unsubscribe send a mail to clutter+unsubscr...@o-hand.com
