Are you sure its possible to hear any difference? I don't know, but they both use the sinc algorithm, and a short benchmarks I did two years ago showed that snd's resampler using a low src-width use a lot less cpu than libsamplerate.
On Tue, 22 May 2007, Juan Pampin wrote:
Hi Bill, I was wondering how hard would it be to add support in snd to use libsamplerate (or secret rabbit code: http://www.mega-nerd.com/SRC/) I have been using this library for high-quality sampling rate conversion with very good results (I guess it's what programs like Ardour and Audacity use too). Best, JUAN On 5/22/07, Bill Schottstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> It is never stated what the first case ('num') is supposed to > represent. Hunh?? The very next sentences are: "A value greater than 1.0 causes the sound to be transposed up. A value less than 0.0 causes the sound to be reversed." I'll add another example, but there are dozens scattered around the *.scm files, and in the src-channel documentation directly above src-sound. _______________________________________________ Cmdist mailing list [email protected] http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist_______________________________________________ Cmdist mailing list [email protected] http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist
_______________________________________________ Cmdist mailing list [email protected] http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist
