Bill Schottstaedt wrote: > I hope so. In terms of with-sound and clm, if anything you can do more > in Snd than in CL. The error handling in Snd is much better than in any of > the > lisps except maybe ACL (Common Lisp debuggers are much worse than you can > imagine, and no attempt is ever made to help with foreign functions -- you > sometimes > can't even use gdb).
It's not that bad, surely? It isn't possible to trace through the foreign function from Lisp, but I have found that (Lispworks/SBCL) + (SLIME+CFFI) provide sufficient feedback in the wrappers I've written for SDL and OpenRM. - Luke _______________________________________________ Cmdist mailing list [email protected] http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist
