> I suppose if I have a go with the docs I can work out how to use Snd as a batchable Music V engine?
I hope so. In terms of with-sound and clm, if anything you can do more in Snd than in CL. The error handling in Snd is much better than in any of the lisps except maybe ACL (Common Lisp debuggers are much worse than you can imagine, and no attempt is ever made to help with foreign functions -- you sometimes can't even use gdb). CL/CLM is still about twice as fast -- I only ran "Phrygians" through both, but someday I'll have time to make a more comprehensive comparison. But that speed up is swamped by the time you'll spend tearing your hair and cursing if you ever make a typo or any mistake of any kind. Whenever I launch into some new project, I use Snd (rather than CL) without even a second thought. Once developed, the code is very easy to translate from Scheme to CL -- they are almost the same language and CLM is fully supported in both. clm23.scm has a list of the differences. _______________________________________________ Cmdist mailing list [email protected] http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist
