As long as Jo is asking this, I might as well ask further (though I admit I have made no effort to figure this out on my own):
Jo is talking about doing non-realtime work, including doing analysis tasks on one file, using that information to guide a synthesis process on another file, the output of which might be processed by other instruments and combined together... The type of stuff one does with (with-sound) in CLM. To what degree does it makes sense to try to do that kind of approach within the SND framework? -=Bret On 25/5/07 3:09 pm, "Joseph Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Bill, > > Oops, not intending to be so selective in my quoting. . . the below quote just > jumped out at me. > > So would you suggest the Snd route as the modern way forward? Just a quick > glance at the Snd pages, the option of using Ruby looks somewhat more > approachable for the lisp clueless. > > I suppose if I have a go with the docs I can work out how to use Snd as a > batchable Music V engine? > > So you're suggesting this path rather than the clm-3? > > > Thanks, > Jo > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Bill Schottstaedt > Sent: Fri 05/25/2007 1:18 PM > To: Joseph Anderson; [email protected] > Cc: > Subject: Re: [CM] Newbie learning. . . . CM / CLM-3 / SND / Scheme??? > >> interpreted Scheme (as in Snd currently) is about 30 to 100 times >> slower than CLM instruments using the run macro. > > Geez, it's the week for selective quoting -- the very next sentence explains > that the run macro exists now in Snd, and the difference in compute time > is more like a factor of 4 -- even that strikes me as high -- I'll have to > re-run some of my timing tests to see how close it is. I'll rewrite that > paragraph. I think Snd is easier to use than the CL versions of clm. > I don't have an extended tutorial for clm -- one is badly needed. > There are lots of example instruments and note lists, and sndscm.html > has individual discussions of each of the clm instruments in Snd (clm-ins > for example). > > _______________________________________________ > Cmdist mailing list > [email protected] > http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist > > > > ****************************************************************************** > *********** > To view the terms under which this email is distributed, please go to > http://www.hull.ac.uk/legal/email_disclaimer.html > ****************************************************************************** > *********** _______________________________________________ Cmdist mailing list [email protected] http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist
