Don't know the full story and glad IBM is taking this step. What I don't get is why has to be this way? I mean, why you have to step aside?
Miguel > On Jun 29, 2015, at 10:11 AM, John P. Hartmann <[email protected]> wrote: > > Perhaps I should chime in. > > Almost a year ago Romney White contacted me about the user requirement > for upgrading the "lead pipes" twenty-five years after the original > priority 5 requirement to have "indoor pipes". Apparently this latter > one was put as forcefully to IBM as the first one was. > > My response was that IBM is more that welcome to my work over the last > five years as a free agent; and while I decline any further working > relationships with IBM, it might be smart for IBM to hire Rob to do the > job; in which case I should be happy to consult without charge. > > I am glad that IBM finally did see the light and hired Rob. And I am > sure Rob will do splendidly. He has all my support. > > Clearly there will be an interregnum. Rob and I will have no problems > dealing with that. > > Once pipes are back in VM in full strength, I shall bow out. > > >> On 06/29/2015 02:30 PM, Rob Van der Heij wrote: >> IBM is investigating ways to bring the latest version of CMS Pipelines into >> the z/VM product. Various approaches are being considered to balance the >> resources available with customer value. >> >> If you have any thoughts or ideas about this, we would be most interested >> to learn about those. You can also contact me directly if you want to >> discuss your ideas or concerns off-line. >> >> IBM plans and directions are subject to change without notice. >> >> --- >> Rob van der Heij - z/VM Development >> [email protected] >>
