Can anyone share plans to expand pipes support on z/OS? Could it ever become part of the z/OS base?
On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Rob van der Heij <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12 November 2016, Paul Gilmartin wrote: > > > > * Functionally similar to the latest Runtime Library from Marist > > > > "Similar" is frightening. Will there be incompatibilities? > > I've depended on WARP which is somehow deprecated. I might > > try to be more Pipethinkful if there were examples or guidelines > > on replacing WARP. That seems to be left as an exercise for the > > student. > > I obviously did not want to worry someone. "Similar" is as close to > "the same" as you can get. My standards for accuracy may be a bit > to strict. The biggest difference is probably the default style, > but if that never bothered you before, it does not need now. > > I am not aware that WARP would be a bad thing. There's ways to > abuse it, and it's not meant for plumbers who can't solder their > fittings. Share you're challenge with me off-line and we can see > what needs to be demonstrated. Always interested in ideas. > > Rob van der Heij > z/VM Development - CMS Pipelines > -- OREXXMan
