Hi Faruk, >> if you have to choose between two CMS's that >> both fit your needs equally well, and one is >> without tidy and the other one with, then >> definitely go for the one With Tidy. Another way to look at this is - there must be something fundamentally wrong with the CMS if it generates bad markup and relies on clean-up tools to fix the markup.
Regards, -Vlad http://xstandard.com Standards-compliant XHTML WYSIWYG editor Faruk Ates wrote: >>Quite a few CMSs have Tidy either built in or as addon module to perform >>this type of function. >> >>Geoff > > > Indeed - my CMS (not open source, not finished yet and no English version > ready yet either) uses Tidy for dealing with most of all the user input. > This because I have to ensure well-formedness on all aspects that are > variable, which is, well, a LOT! And Tidy is simply the only way to > reliably deal with that, without having to do an awful (read: obscene) > amount of coding yourself. > > Tidy's absolutely excellent. Very powerful and flexible - so, my > recommendation is, if you have to choose between two CMS's that both fit > your needs equally well, and one is without tidy and the other one with, > then definitely go for the one With Tidy. > > > Cheers, > Faruk Ates > ********************************************************* > The CMS discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ > ********************************************************* > > ********************************************************* The CMS discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/ *********************************************************
