On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 03:55:28PM +0200, Eric Marsden wrote: > > >>>>> "nn" == Nicolas Neuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > nn> I guess that Debian is not helpful with CMUCL, then. I had hoped that I > nn> could recommend to Debian users an installation of cmucl, asdf, cl-ppcre, > nn> cl-infix, and ilisp with "apt-get install". Bad luck. > > Debian packages the latest official release of CMUCL, which is why > they distribute 18e. Perhaps someone could sponsor a cmucl-snapshot > package with our monthly snapshot binaries.
I uploaded a 19a-pre3 based version to 'experimental' a few days ago. http://packages.debian.org/experimental/devel/cmucl gives the details. The differences with the official package (http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/c/cmucl/cmucl_19a-0pre2.diff.gz) should be smaller then it seems due to building problems... I hope to resolve them before 19a gets released officialy. The bug-list I got from somewhere but I think I'll do away with it, as to my regret I don't spend so much time developing cmucl anymore. > While I'm a Debian user, I must admit that I don't use its cmucl > packages; I've run into annoyances with the common-lisp-controller. This seems to be a common feeling. Me and Kevin are thinking about a simpler design. Groetjes, Peter -- It's logic Jim, but not as we know it. | [EMAIL PROTECTED] "God, root, what is difference?" - Pitr| http://people.debian.org/~pvaneynd/ "God is more forgiving." - Dave Aronson| -- Attached file included as plaintext by Listar -- -- File: signature.asc -- Desc: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFA+F6Q11ldN0tyliURAg5CAJ9IzERaTDtNvshKUu0rwNfE1F+T+QCfeqrU R/gC9e6SoFa7ruWvYL1HOmM= =7+hZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
