Tim Moore writes:
>
> On 3 Dec 2002, Raymond Toy wrote:
>
> > >>>>> "Tim" == Tim Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Tim> I think it's an indication of how good things really are in the free Lisp
> > Tim> world that we can find room to complain about threading portability :) I
> > Tim> would guess that within the next year all the major free Lisps will have
> > Tim> preemptive, if not native, thread implementations.
> >
> > Including CMUCL? Who's working on that?
>
> At the least, I'm assuming we can steal Dan's SBCL work :)
I was figuring that's what you meant for CMUCL, but I'm curious: is
CLISP working on threads, too?
--
/|_ .-----------------------.
,' .\ / | No to Imperialist war |
,--' _,' | Wage class war! |
/ / `-----------------------'
( -. |
| ) |
(`-. '--.)
`. )----'
