> > And how is this going to work, say, under CMUCL > where > > yield() is needed? > > By putting calls to process-yield in your portable > code :) This is, of > course, only needed if you don't block for I/O. I've never liked this solution. It has the obvious problem that i need to go into libraries and insert these yields. It also creates performance issues with tight long loops. I know, i should be fixing, not complaining... If only i had the time.... dave __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com
- Re: Multiprocessing Nicolas Neuss
- Re: Multiprocessing Mario Mommer
- Re: Multiprocessing Nicolas Neuss
- Re: Multiprocessing David Hanley
- Re: Multiprocessing Edi Weitz
- Re: Multiprocessing David Hanley
- Re: Multiprocessing Marco Antoniotti
- Re: Multiprocessing David Hanley
- Re: Multiprocessing Marco Antoniotti
- Re: Multiprocessing Tim Moore
- Re: Multiprocessing David Hanley
- Re: Multiprocessing Tim Moore
- Re: Multiprocessing Raymond Toy
- Re: Multiprocessing Tim Moore
- Re: Multiprocessing Raymond Toy
- Re: Multiprocessing Daniel Barlow
- Re: Multiprocessing Thomas F. Burdick
- Re: Multiprocessing Tim Moore
- Re: Multiprocessing Edi Weitz
- Re: Multiprocessing Martin Cracauer
- Re: Multiprocessing Tim Moore
